The science and their types, second part.

previously we had discussed why science does not give us the truth, and what would be the solution, a solution based on the structure of reason itself, so that the truth we seek is absolute we need to attend to the trilemma of gripias: 1.To be certain of a statement we must prove it. 2. For the proof to be valid we need to demonstrate the proof. 3. This leads us to an ad infinitum, where we will never be certain of anything. The solution to this is to get the one to prove himself, this of course should not be confused with a circular argument, circular arguments do not actually prove themselves even if they seem like it, example: God is real because the bible says so. 2. The bible is true because God wrote it. Actually this argument contains a wrong premise, that the bible says that God exists does not mean that God exists.What we are going to look for is a truth whose key concepts we can only conceptualize as true, in such a way that denying them is the same as saying : hkbjfbhvcnh, simply an absurdity without meaning, the fact that something cannot be conceptualized does not mean that it does not exist, but it means that when talking about something that if it can be conceptualized, nothing related to the discussion of the object in question will be said. In this way, the principle in question will have to be real, since by saying that it is not real, nothing will be said, the proof that it is real will be that it is real, and saying that it is not real will mean nothing.